jitter free web browser

Note: this is a very long post, a meditation in draft form. I've revised it a little bit since I first posted it. I was sitting quietly the other day, reflecting on things to do with our faith, conversations I’ve had in recent days, as a Catholic, with Evangelical/Emergent Christians, thinking about the nature of authority in the Catholic Church and how different it is from authority in the Protestant world, when suddenly I heard a word, spoken very clearly in my mind: Acquiescence. Since coming into the Catholic world, I’ve read and thought a lot about the quality, or virtue, of obedience, and about its necessity as a virtue to develop if zuma deluxe one hopes to grow in holiness: obedience to the Church on matters of the faith, trusting that the Church has been endowed by God with the charism of infallible interpretation of Scripture and all matters of the faith, through the office of the Pope and the Magisterium in union with the Pope. I have also been aware, both in the Protestant world and in the Catholic world, of much bickering about matters of the faith. At times, I’ve done my share of bickering, perhaps more than I should. As a Catholic, I’ve done my share of struggling with certain of the doctrines hard to understand, or challenging to really accept and live. I’ve struggled with aspects of church life in the Catholic world that are frustrating, or less than fulfilling.

We had a great discussion the other night at the Emergent Cohort I attended. It is rare that a scholar the likes of Dr. Iain Torrance is Movie Packs in attendance at an event that also includes me, whose greatest claim to fame is being listed as a one of the Ten Emerging Church Bloggers . Hope he didn't feel like he was slummin' it. The discussion was around the issue of pastor as theologian. Tony Jones framed the question well by creating an ethical situation similar to that which he had created in this post , which brings the issue of present theology to the fore. After several of us weighed in with various thoughts, Dr. Torrance brought up the excellent question of the danger of seeking the contemporary. He used Athanasius and the Arian controversy to illustrate his point. Two admissions before moving on. One, I am not a trained theologian or academic. Antonio Gramsci talks about organic intellectuals. I am at best an organic blogger, and sometimes more ripe than others. While I might accept the notion of organic, throwing in the word intellectual skews the conversation and doesn't address the wired world in which I have found a voice. The folks at the Princeton cohort quote Volf and Moltmann. In my natural world I am more likely to quote Locke (Christopher, not John) and Lessig . Second, any theological knowledge I do have comes from my personal reading, which has been heavily influenced by missiological texts, including The Gospel in a Pluralist Society and Transforming Mission .

Note: this is a very long post, a meditation in draft form. I've revised it a little bit since I first posted it. I was sitting quietly the other day, reflecting on things to do with our faith, conversations I’ve had in recent days, as a Catholic, with Evangelical/Emergent Christians, thinking about the nature of authority in the Catholic Church and how different it is from authority in the Protestant world, when suddenly I heard a word, spoken very clearly in my mind: Acquiescence. Since coming into the Catholic world, I’ve read and thought a lot about the quality, or virtue, of obedience, and about its necessity as a virtue to develop if one hopes to grow in holiness: obedience to the Church on matters of the faith, trusting that the Church has been endowed by God with the charism of infallible interpretation of Scripture and all matters of the faith, through the office of the Pope and the Magisterium in union with the Pope. I have also been aware, both in the Protestant world and in the Catholic world, of much bickering about matters of the faith. At times, I’ve free medical pda programs done my share of bickering, perhaps more than I should. As a Catholic, I’ve done my share of struggling with certain of the doctrines hard to understand, or challenging to really accept and live. I’ve struggled with aspects of church life in the Catholic world that are frustrating, or less than fulfilling.

Note: this is a very long post, a meditation in draft form. I've revised it a little bit since I first posted it. I was sitting quietly the other day, reflecting on things to do with our faith, conversations I’ve had in recent days, as a Catholic, with Evangelical/Emergent Christians, thinking about the nature of authority in the Catholic Church and how different it is from authority in the Protestant world, when suddenly I heard a word, spoken very clearly rebate programs in my mind: Acquiescence. Since coming into the Catholic world, I’ve read and thought a lot about the quality, or virtue, of obedience, and about its necessity as a virtue to develop if one hopes to grow in holiness: obedience to the Church on matters of the faith, trusting that the Church has been endowed by God with the charism of infallible interpretation of Scripture and all matters of the faith, through the office of the Pope and the Magisterium in union with the Pope. I have also been aware, both in the Protestant world and in the Catholic world, of much bickering about matters of the faith. At times, I’ve done my share of bickering, perhaps more than I should. As a Catholic, I’ve done my share of struggling with certain of the doctrines hard to understand, or challenging to really accept and live. I’ve struggled with aspects of church life in the Catholic world that are frustrating, or less than fulfilling.

Click Here

Robert X. Cringely writes: ... WiMax, like most wireless networking technologies, is either-or. You can either have lots of bandwidth or you can have long search engine optimization orange county range. There are exceptions to this rule if you have line-of-sight transmission and can use a matched set of high-gain antennas. Then, sure, WiMax can send those 70+ megabits per second for 30 miles and more -- sometimes a LOT more. But the way most of us envision using WiMax is with lower gain antennas, often without line of sight, and possibly even while moving from place to place, so the trade-off of bandwidth for distance is pretty severe. Most WiMax users will find that they can't get the target 70 megabits per second at 30 miles. They'll be lucky to get even one megabit per second at 30 miles. Possibly a LOT less, as WiMax's adaptive modulation slows transmission and throws on lots of forward error correction to make sure the signal gets through, however sluggishly. ... Link: PBS.org . Thanks to Stephen Hill for the tip. I live on top of an Idaho mountain ridge and just opened up a pseudo-WiMAX Clearwire account (discussed in the article) to replace the frustrating 802.11 based WISP that I've been using for five years. The only other broadband option for me is satellite. The original WISP might have a bit of an edge inbound (when it works at all), but the Clearwire account (which breaks more frequently but is easy to fix) has it all over the WISP outbound. --Dennis

Robert X. Cringely writes: ... WiMax, like most wireless networking technologies, is either-or. You can either have lots of bandwidth or you can have long range. There are exceptions to this rule if you have line-of-sight transmission and can use a matched set of high-gain antennas. Then, sure, WiMax can send those 70+ megabits per second for 30 miles and more -- sometimes a LOT more. But the way most of us envision using WiMax is with lower gain antennas, often without line of sight, and possibly even while linux shared hosting moving from place to place, so the trade-off of bandwidth for distance is pretty severe. Most WiMax users will find that they can't get the target 70 megabits per second at 30 miles. They'll be lucky to get even one megabit per second at 30 miles. Possibly a LOT less, as WiMax's adaptive modulation slows transmission and throws on lots of forward error correction to make sure the signal gets through, however sluggishly. ... Link: PBS.org . Thanks to Stephen Hill for the tip. I live on top of an Idaho mountain ridge and just opened up a pseudo-WiMAX Clearwire account (discussed in the article) to replace the frustrating 802.11 based WISP that I've been using for five years. The only other broadband option for me is satellite. The original WISP might have a bit of an edge inbound (when it works at all), but the Clearwire account (which breaks more frequently but is easy to fix) has it all over the WISP outbound. --Dennis

Note: this is a very long post, a meditation in draft form. I've revised it a little bit since I first posted it. I was sitting quietly the other day, reflecting on things to do with our faith, conversations I’ve had in recent days, as a Catholic, with Evangelical/Emergent Christians, thinking about the nature of authority in the Catholic Church and how different it is from authority in the Protestant world, when suddenly I heard a word, spoken very clearly in my mind: Acquiescence. Since coming into the Catholic world, I’ve read and thought a lot about the quality, or virtue, of obedience, and about its necessity as a virtue to develop if one hopes to grow in holiness: obedience to the Church on matters of the faith, trusting that the Church has been endowed by God with the charism of infallible interpretation of Scripture and all matters of the faith, through the office of the Pope and the Magisterium in union with the Pope. I have also been aware, both in the Protestant world and in the Catholic world, of much bickering about matters of the faith. At times, I’ve done my share of bickering, perhaps more than I should. As a Catholic, I’ve done my share of struggling with certain of the doctrines hard to understand, or challenging to really accept and live. I’ve struggled with high speed video camera aspects of church life in the Catholic world that are frustrating, or less than fulfilling.

We had a great discussion the other night at the Emergent Cohort I attended. It is rare that a scholar the likes of Dr. Iain Torrance is in attendance at an event that also includes me, whose greatest claim to fame is being listed as a one of the Ten Emerging Church Bloggers . Hope he didn't feel like he was slummin' it. The discussion was around the issue of pastor as theologian. Tony Jones free spyware blockers framed the question well by creating an ethical situation similar to that which he had created in this post , which brings the issue of present theology to the fore. After several of us weighed in with various thoughts, Dr. Torrance brought up the excellent question of the danger of seeking the contemporary. He used Athanasius and the Arian controversy to illustrate his point. Two admissions before moving on. One, I am not a trained theologian or academic. Antonio Gramsci talks about organic intellectuals. I am at best an organic blogger, and sometimes more ripe than others. While I might accept the notion of organic, throwing in the word intellectual skews the conversation and doesn't address the wired world in which I have found a voice. The folks at the Princeton cohort quote Volf and Moltmann. In my natural world I am more likely to quote Locke (Christopher, not John) and Lessig . Second, any theological knowledge I do have comes from my personal reading, which has been heavily influenced by missiological texts, including The Gospel in a Pluralist Society and Transforming Mission .

We had a great discussion the other night at the Emergent Cohort I attended. It is rare that a scholar the likes of Dr. Iain Torrance is in attendance at an event that also includes me, whose greatest claim to fame is being listed as a one of the Ten Emerging Church Bloggers . Hope he didn't feel like he was slummin' it. The discussion was around the issue of pastor as theologian. Tony Jones framed the question well by creating an ethical situation similar to that which he had created in this post , which brings the issue of present theology to the fore. After several of us weighed in with various thoughts, Dr. Torrance brought up the excellent question of the danger of seeking the contemporary. He used Athanasius and the Arian controversy to illustrate his point. Two admissions before moving on. One, I am not a trained theologian or academic. Antonio Gramsci talks about organic intellectuals. I am at best an organic blogger, and sometimes more ripe than others. While I might accept the notion of organic, throwing in the word intellectual skews the conversation and doesn't address the wired world in which I have found a voice. The folks at the Princeton cohort quote Volf candy sample and Moltmann. In my natural world I am more likely to quote Locke (Christopher, not John) and Lessig . Second, any theological knowledge I do have comes from my personal reading, which has been heavily influenced by missiological texts, including The Gospel in a Pluralist Society and Transforming Mission .

Click Here

Note: this is a very long post, a meditation in draft form. I've revised it a little bit since I first posted it. I was sitting quietly the other day, reflecting on things to do with our faith, conversations I’ve had in recent days, as a Catholic, with Evangelical/Emergent Christians, thinking about the nature of authority in the Catholic Church and how different it is from authority in the Protestant world, when suddenly I heard a word, spoken very clearly in my mind: Acquiescence. Since coming into the Catholic world, I’ve read and thought a lot about the quality, or virtue, of obedience, and about its necessity as a virtue to develop if one hopes to grow in holiness: obedience to the Church on matters of the faith, trusting that the Church has been endowed by God with the charism of infallible interpretation of Scripture and all matters of the faith, through the office of the Pope and the Magisterium in union with the Pope. I have also been aware, both in the Protestant online picture share world and in the Catholic world, of much bickering about matters of the faith. At times, I’ve done my share of bickering, perhaps more than I should. As a Catholic, I’ve done my share of struggling with certain of the doctrines hard to understand, or challenging to really accept and live. I’ve struggled with aspects of church life in the Catholic world that are frustrating, or less than fulfilling.

Robert X. Cringely writes: ... WiMax, like most wireless networking technologies, is either-or. You can either have lots of bandwidth or you can have long range. There are exceptions to this rule if you have line-of-sight transmission and can use a matched set of high-gain antennas. Then, sure, WiMax can send those 70+ megabits per second for 30 miles and more -- sometimes hustler a LOT more. But the way most of us envision using WiMax is with lower gain antennas, often without line of sight, and possibly even while moving from place to place, so the trade-off of bandwidth for distance is pretty severe. Most WiMax users will find that they can't get the target 70 megabits per second at 30 miles. They'll be lucky to get even one megabit per second at 30 miles. Possibly a LOT less, as WiMax's adaptive modulation slows transmission and throws on lots of forward error correction to make sure the signal gets through, however sluggishly. ... Link: PBS.org . Thanks to Stephen Hill for the tip. I live on top of an Idaho mountain ridge and just opened up a pseudo-WiMAX Clearwire account (discussed in the article) to replace the frustrating 802.11 based WISP that I've been using for five years. The only other broadband option for me is satellite. The original WISP might have a bit of an edge inbound (when it works at all), but the Clearwire account (which breaks more frequently but is easy to fix) has it all over the WISP outbound. --Dennis